Which method of developing systems is well-suited to traditional project management tools and techniques?

Structured analysis is well-suited to traditional project management tools and techniques because it follows a linear and sequential approach to system development. This method emphasizes detailed documentation, clear specifications, and thorough planning, aligning perfectly with classic project management methodologies such as Waterfall.

In structured analysis, each phase of development is clearly defined and must be completed before moving on to the next, allowing project managers to effectively utilize tools like Gantt charts, critical path method (CPM), and PERT (Program Evaluation Review Technique) charts to schedule and monitor progress. This structured framework enables comprehensive risk assessment and ensures that project timelines and costs can be managed effectively.

This level of organization and clarity in structured analysis contrasts with other methodologies that either embrace ongoing change and iterations, such as Agile development, or that involve more flexibility and adaptation throughout the project lifecycle, such as Rapid Application Development and Spiral Development. These latter approaches may not align as neatly with traditional project management techniques, which often prioritize strict adherence to initial plans and schedules over responsiveness to changing requirements.