What is the term for a review of a project team member's work by other team members to ensure quality?

The appropriate term for a review of a project team member's work by other team members to ensure quality is a peer review. This process involves colleagues assessing each other's work to provide constructive feedback and identify any errors or areas for improvement. The goal is to enhance the quality of the output before it moves to the next stage of development or is delivered to a client.

Peer reviews are essential in collaborative environments as they encourage knowledge sharing among team members, promote accountability, and often catch issues that the original author may have overlooked. This process can also foster a sense of team cohesion and collective ownership of the project's quality.

While structured walk-throughs, quality assurance, and project audits are related to assessing work, they differ in their execution and focus. Structured walk-throughs are a specific type of review where the work product is described and examined in a formal meeting, typically with set procedures. Quality assurance refers to the processes and activities that ensure standards and procedures are followed to prevent defects. A project audit involves a comprehensive evaluation of a project's performance and processes but is typically carried out by external auditors rather than team members.